Nuclear Security Culture Assessment of Medical Facilities in Malaysia

Amirul Fakhruddin  Jamaludin; Zunaide  Kayun; Sharudin Omar  Baki; Mohammad Johari  Ibahim; Muhammad Khalis Abdul  Karim

doi:10.17605/cajmns.v5i2.2406

Amirul Fakhruddin Jamaludin Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Zunaide Kayun Medical Radiation Surveillance Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Complex E, Federal Government Administrative Centre, 62590 Putrajaya
Sharudin Omar Baki Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Mohammad Johari Ibahim Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknolgi MARA, 47000 Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/cajmns.v5i2.2406

Keywords: nuclear safety, security culture, International Atomic Energy Agency, questionnaires, helathcare worker

Abstract

National regulations are always consistent in providing the first layer of safety and security in nuclear-related medical facilities. Since its introduction, nuclear security has become the main focus of organizations to prevent any malicious activities due to internal and external threats made possible as harsh idealism growth is consistent with an increased number of populations. Briefly, the self-assessment allows an organization to develop and maintain a security culture among nuclear personnel by testing out knowledge and awareness involves radioactive sources. The objective of this study is to evaluate certain areas of an organization on nuclear security culture based on IAEA’s nuclear security model. A survey was performed on 117 radiological personnel that uses ionizing radiation sourcing from radioactive materials as well as irradiating apparatuses direct and indirectly by handing out cross-sectional questionnaires. The questions (scaled using numerical values, 1-7) were collected and categorized into several populations which are level of education, age, years of working and etc. The scores were then analyzed using appropriate statistical method. A report on strengths and weaknesses in several areas was given back to the organization for further development and enhancement of security. The study shows that awareness is greater within personnel with higher level of education. The results also showed an in awareness with age due to the fact that workers who are older portrayed a deeper understanding of what they are doing. There is a significant difference of scores in terms of duration of service where workers with 6-10 years of experience were more aware of the importance of security culture compared to those with 21-30 years of experience. In conclusion, it is found that there are several factors including the subject’s demographic that affect the level of awareness and knowledge among radiation personnel that works with radioactive materials.

References

A. R. Antariksawan, “Nuclear Security Culture and BATAN’s Assessment: BATAN’s Experience,” Int. J. Nucl. Secur., vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.7290/V7QC01DB.

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, “IAEA Nuclear Safety and Security Glossary,” IAEA Nucl. Saf. Secur. Gloss., vol. 2022, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/IAEA-NSS-GLOweb.pdf.

I. Conference and N. Security, “International Conference on Nuclear Security 2020 Adult learning and nuclear security : the important role of adult learning educational practices for impactful cross-disciplinary nuclear security training Adult learning and nuclear security : the important role of adult learning educational practices for Summary :,” 2020.

IAEA, “Nuclear Security Culture: Implementing Guide,” IAEA Nucl. Secur. Ser., no. 7, pp. 1–48, 2008.

C. József, S. O. L. Y. Máté, H. O. R. V. Kristóf, and V. Gyula, “Nuclear Security Culture Self-Assessment in a Radioactive Material Associated Facility Introduction – International Experience Fundamentals of Nuclear Security,” Aarms, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 265, 2017.

H. Yoo and J. H. Lee, “Results of nuclear security culture survey on personnel at nuclear power plants,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 85, pp. 398–402, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.05.001.

I. Alrammah and A. Ajlouni, “Annals of Nuclear Energy A framework and a survey analysis on nuclear security culture at various radiological facilities,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 158, p. 108294, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108294.

A. D. Prabaswari and R. Dharmastiti, “The Survey on the Perception of Safety and Security Culture for Nuclear Workers,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 528, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/528/1/012017.

C. Sun and X. Zhu, “Evaluating the public perceptions of nuclear power in China: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey,” Energy Policy, vol. 69, pp. 397–405, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2014.03.011.

International Atomic Energy Agency, “Security of Radioactive Material in Use and Storage and of Associated Facilities IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 11-G (Rev. 1) Implementing Guide,” no. 11, 2019.

Y. Yan and F. Lu, “A survey and analysis on the sense of nuclear safety & security for the public: A Chinese perspective,” Sustain., vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1–11, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10072495.

D. Beglar and T. Nemoto, “Developing Likert-scale questionnaires,” JALT2013 Conf. Proc., pp. 1–8, 2014.

M. Mahoney and R. Magel, “Estimation of the power of the Kruskal-Wallis test,” Biometrical J., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 613–630, 1996, doi: 10.1002/bimj.4710380510.

E. Theodorsson-Norheim, “Kruskal-Wallis test: BASIC computer program to perform nonparametric one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons on ranks of several independent samples,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 57–62, 1986, doi: 10.1016/0169-2607(86)90081-7.

J. W. Gooch, “Kruskal-Wallis Test,” Encycl. Dict. Polym., no. 1, pp. 984–985, 2011, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6247-8_15268.

E. Ostertagová, O. Ostertag, and J. Kováč, “Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 611, pp. 115–120, 2014, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.611.115.

S. Gandhi and J. Kang, “Annals of Nuclear Energy Nuclear safety and nuclear security synergy,” vol. 60, pp. 357–361, 2013.

N. I. Geraskin, A. A. Krasnoborodko, V. B. Glebov, and A. Taisia, “Nuclear security culture enhancement : the role of culture coordinators at Russian nuclear sites,” vol. 1798, no. January, 2016, doi: 10.1080/14751798.2015.1087103.

J. Cesar and I. Trajano, “Original Article A Policy Analysis of Nuclear Safety Culture and Security Culture in East Asia : Examining Best Practices and Challenges Julius Cesar Trajano , MSc,” Nucl. Eng. Technol., 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.net.2019.04.014.

D. Gupta and E. Bajramovic, “Security Culture for Nuclear Facilities,” vol. 050014, 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.4972948.