CHOICE OF SURGICAL METHODS IN PATIENTS WITH URINARY STONE DISEASE

  • Nurillaev J. Y Samarkand Medical University
  • Muxamadiev N. K. Samarkand State University
  • Nurillaev X. J. XN samturk group LLC, Samarkand, Uzbekistan
Keywords: Urolithiasis, distant shock wave lithotripsy, contact ureterolithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, nephrolithiasis

Abstract

Evaluation of the effectiveness of various methods of treating patients with urolithiasis, and recommending the best methods of minimally invasive surgical interventions. Patients and methods. To systematize the main clinical material, all patients, depending on the location of the calculus, were divided into two groups: the first group - patients with ureteral stones; the second group - with kidney stones. Depending on the method of performing surgical intervention, both groups were divided into 4 options, in options II, III, IV, minimally invasive technologies were used as monotherapy, as well as their combinations. The comparison group consisted of patients who underwent traditional open surgery. The results of treatment were assessed clinically in the near and long term. Treatment was considered ineffective in the presence of residual stones not removed during this hospitalization.

References

1. Apolikhin O.I., Sivkov A.V., Komarova V.A., Prosyanikov M.Yu., Golovanov S.A., Kazachenko A.V., Nikushina A.A., Shadyorkina V.A. Zabolevaemost urinary stone disease in the Russian Federation (2005-2016 year). Experimental and clinical urology 2018(4):4-14.
2. Alyaev, Yu. G. Urinary tract disease. Sovremennyy vzglyad na problemu: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey / Yu. G. Alyaev, P. V. Glybochko. - M.: Medforum, 2016. - 148 p.
3. Glybochko, P. V. Osobennosti lecheniya retsidiva uratnogo nephrolithiaza / P. V. Glybochko, V. A. Grigoryan, V. I. Rudenko [i dr.] // Therapy. – 2017. – No. 4. – S. 93–101.
4. Dzeranov N.K., Lopatkin N.A. Urinary tract disease. Clinical recommendations. - Moscow, Izdatelstvo "Overley", 2007. - p. 296
5. Konstantinova, O. V. Epidemiological otsenka urothelial disease and ambulatory urological practice / O. V. Konstantinova, V. A. Shaderkina. – Experimental and clinical urology. - 2015. - T. 1. – S. 11–14.
6. Lopatkin N.A. Urinary tract disease. Urology: national leadership. - M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2009. - 1024 p.
7. Martov, A. G. Rehabilitation of patients after vypolneniya sovremennykh endourologicheskikh operatsii po povodu chechekamennoy disease / A. G. Martov, D. V. Ergakov // Urology. – 2018. – No. 4. – S. 49–55.
8. Nazarov, T.Kh. Comparative analysis of two-energy computer tomography data and results of mineralogy issledovaniya of urinary stones in urolithiasis / T. X. Nazarov, I. V. Rychkov, D. G. Lebedev, K. E. Trubnikova // Luchevaya diagnosis and therapy. – 2018. – No. 2 (9). - S.54-58.
9. Nurillaev J.Ya, Mukhamadiev N. K., Shodmonova Z.R., Rasulov R. Kh., Nurillaev Kh.J. // Biomeditsiny i praktiki.. – 2022. Special edition No. 5.1. - S.201-206.
10. Nurillaev J.Ya., Mukhamadiev N.K., Nurillaev J.Ya., Khaidarova D.S. Sbornik trudov VIII Rossiyskogo kongressa po endourologii i novym tekhnologim s mejdunarodnym uchastiem. Moscow, 2002. – P.18-19.
11. Doizi S., Raynal G., Traxer O. Evolution of urolithiasis treatment over 30 years in a French academic institution. Prog Urol 2015;25(9):543-548.
Published
2023-08-10
How to Cite
Nurillaev J. Y, Muxamadiev N. K., & Nurillaev X. J. (2023). CHOICE OF SURGICAL METHODS IN PATIENTS WITH URINARY STONE DISEASE. Central Asian Journal of Medical and Natural Science, 4(4), 392-397. Retrieved from https://cajmns.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJMNS/article/view/1711
Section
Articles