Prevalence of Multidrug Resistance in Enterococci Isolates from Different Clinical Sources in Al-Diwaniyah City

  • Zahraa Ali Motashar Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al- Diwaniayh, Iraq
  • Syoof Khoman Al-Ramahi Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al- Diwaniayh, Iraq
Keywords: Enterococci Isolates

Abstract

Background: Enterococcus spp is one of the most important pathogens, and it has shown great resistance in recent times, and this has become a concern for health in the world.The aim is to determine the prevalence of multidrug resistance in enterococcus spp isolates in Al-Diwaniyah city.Methods: 150 samples were collected in this study from multiple clinical sources ( urine, stool seminal fluid, vaginally swab, blood)) from patients in Al-Diwaniyah General Teaching Hospital and Maternity and Children Teaching Hospital and afaq General hospital. during the period from the first of September 2022 to January 2023, where the isolates were identified through microscopic examination, gram stain, biochemical assays, selective medium, and VITEK-2 system.Results: A total of 50(33.33%) isolates were identified as enterococcus spp from 150) clinical samples(40 E.faecalis,10 E.faecium) that collected from different sources, that distributed( urine:13(43%)E.faecalis, 7(28%) E.faecium, Stool:12(25%) E.faecalis,3(37.5%) E.faecium,seminal fluid:2(20%) E.faecalis,vaginally swab:11(31%) E.faecalis,blood:2(10%) E.faecalis). E.faecalis was resistance to antibiotic as as (vancomycine, pencillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, Norfloxacin, Nitrofurantion, Rifampin, Erthromycin, doxycycline)(3(7.5%), 10(25%), 16(40%), 31(77.5%) (,17(42.5%), 14(35%), 6(15%), 30(75%), 29(72.5%), 17(42.5%)) respectively while. E.faecium was resistance to antibiotic as (vancomycine, pencillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, Norfloxacin, Nitrofurantion, Rifampin, Erthromycin, doxycycline) (8(80%), 9(90%), 4(40%), 6(60%), 3(30%), 4(40%), 1(10%), 4(40%), 8(80%), 6(60%)), respectivelyConclusion: E.faecalis isolates showed high resistance to each of the-erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, while E.faecium was highly resistant. to vankomycin, penicillin, erthromycin, as well as to ciprofloxacin, and this causes a problem of concern in this study.A high percentage of MDR among commonly isolated bacteria were found in this study would be a serious, alarming issue.

References

1. Ch’ng, J. H., Chong, K. K., Lam, L. N., Wong, J. J., & Kline, K. A. (2019).Biofilm-associated infection by enterococci. Nature ReviewsMicrobiology, 17(2), 82-94
2. Fisher JF, Meroueh SO, Mobashery S. Bacterial resistance to β-lactam antibiotics: compelling opportunism, compelling opportunity. Chem Rev. 2005;105:395–424. doi: 10.1021/cr030102i
3. Pillay, S., Zishiri, O. T., & Adeleke, M. A. (2018). Prevalence of virulence genes in Enterococcus species isolated from companion animals and livestock. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 85(1), 1-8.
4. Rostkowska, O. M., Kuthan, R., Burban, A., Salińska, J., Ciebiera, M., Młynarczyk, G., & Durlik, M. (2020). Analysis of susceptibility to selected antibiotics in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium causing urinary tract infections in kidney transplant recipients over 8 years: single-center study. Antibiotics, 9(6), 284
5. Gordon S, Swenson JM, Hill BC, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of common and unusual species of enterococci causing infections in the United States. Enterococcal Study Group. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:2373–8.
6. Kaye D. Enterococci. Biologic and epidemiologic characteristics and in vitro susceptibility. Arch Intern Med 1982;142:2006–9
7. Niu, H., Yu, H., Hu, T., Tian, G., Zhang, L., Guo, X., . .. & Wang, Z. (2016). The prevalence of aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme and virulence genes among enterococci with high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Inner Mongolia, China. brazilian journal of microbiology, 47(3), 691-696
8. Heidari, H., Hasanpour, S., Ebrahim-Saraie, H. S., & Motamedifar, M. (2017). High incidence of virulence factors among clinical Enterococcus faecalis isolates in southwestern Iran. Infection & chemotherapy, 49(1), 51-56
9. Heidari, H., Emaneini, M., Dabiri, H., & Jabalameli, F. (2016). Virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance pattern and molecular analysis of Enterococcal strains isolated from burn patients. Microbial pathogenesis, 90, 93-97
10. ‏Kapoor, G., Saigal, S., & Elongavan, A. (2017). Action and resistance mechanisms of antibiotics: A guide for clinicians. Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 33(3), 300.
11. ‏Borbone S., Lupo A., Mezzatesta M. L., Campanile F., Santagati M., and Stefani S.(2008). Evaluation of the in vitro activity of tigecycline against multiresistant Gram-positive cocci containing tetracycline resistance determinants. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 31(3):209–215[PubMed: 17646087]
12. Klibi, N., Amor, I. B., Rahmouni, M., Dziri, R., Douja, G., Said, L. B., . .. & Torres, C. (2015). Diversity of species and antibiotic resistance among fecal enterococci from wild birds in Tunisia. Detection of vanA-containing Enterococcus faecium isolates. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61(2), 319-323.
13. Jones. R. N., Sader H. S., Flamm R. K. Update of dalbavancin spectrum and potency in the USA: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2011). Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 75(3):304–307. [PubMed: 23357293]
14. AL-Yassary, K. A. H. (2011). study of Antibiotic susceptibility and virulence determinants among Enterococcus faecalis isolated from patients with significant Bacteriuria in najaf collage of science, University of kufa ].
15. Hassoun. B.H, (2022). Genetic Diversity and Detection of some Virulence Genes in Enterococcus faecalis Isolated from Different Clinical Sources in Al-Diwaniyah City, University of Al-Qadisiyah
16. Jia. W, Li.G, Wang.W.(2014), Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Enterococcus Species: A Hospital-Based Study in China
17. ‏Kacmaz. B. and Akosy.A, (2005), Antimicrobial resistance of enterococci in Turkey Cariolati. D, Andrighetto. C, Lomardi.A, (2007), Occurrence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistances in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium collected from dairy and human samples in North Italy.
18. Jabbari Shiadeh, S. M., Pormohammad, A., Hashemi, A., & Lak, P. (2019). Global prevalence of antibiotic resistance in blood-isolated Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection and drug resistance, 2713-2725.‏
19. Barbosa-Ribeiro, M., De-Jesus-Soares, A., Zaia, A. A., Ferraz, C. C., Almeida, J. F., & Gomes, B. P. (2016). Antimicrobial susceptibility and characterization of virulence genes of Enterococcus faecalis isolates from teeth with failure of the endodontic treatment. Journal of endodontics, 42(7), 1022-1028..
20. Al-duhhaidhawi. A. H.M., Al-Huchaimi.S.N., Al-Mayah.T.A., Al-Ouqaili.M.T., Al-Kafaas.S.S., (2022), Prevalence of CRISPR-Cas Systems and Their Possible Association with Antibiotic Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis and Collected from Hospital Enterococcus faecium, Wastewater.
21. Ojaimi.R.R, (2022), Identification and molecular characterization of Enterococcus spp. isolated from different clinical cases, AL-Qadisiyah University/ College of Education /Department of Biology
22. Venkatesan, K. D., and Code, Q. R.(2017) Antibiotic resistance pattern of Enterococcal isolates from patients with urinary tract infection.‏ International Journal of Biomedical Research8(06): 357-360
23. Shokoohizadeh, L., Ekrami, A., Labibzadeh, M., Ali, L., & Alavi, S. M. (2018). Antimicrobial resistance patterns and virulence factors of enterococci isolates in hospitalized burn patients. BMC research notes, 11(1), 1
Published
2023-06-17
How to Cite
Motashar, Z. A., & Al-Ramahi, S. K. (2023). Prevalence of Multidrug Resistance in Enterococci Isolates from Different Clinical Sources in Al-Diwaniyah City. Central Asian Journal of Medical and Natural Science, 4(3), 1041-1049. https://doi.org/10.17605/cajmns.v4i3.1618
Section
Articles